Sponsored Links

Kamis, 25 Januari 2018

Sponsored Links

Macron to May: 'Be my guest' to Norway-model Brexit â€
src: g8fip1kplyr33r3krz5b97d1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com

Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), [2002] 3 SCR 519 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court held that prisoners have a right to vote under section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court overturned the prior decision of the Federal Court of Appeal and held that section 51(e) of the old Canada Elections Act, which prohibited prisoners from voting, was unconstitutional. They made the law that any inmates serving more than two years in prison cannot vote. Section 51(e) had been repealed before the date of the Court's judgment, but the decision applied equally to substantially the same provision found in section 4(c) of the new statute. The Court decided that the provision violated section 3 of the Charter and could not be saved under section 1.

As a result of the decision, all adult citizens living in Canada are now able to vote, save the top two officials of Elections Canada. As Parliament has not amended the Canada Elections Act to reflect the Court's decision, the provision is still part of the Act, even though it is of no force or effect.


Video Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)



See also

  • List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (McLachlin Court)
  • Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (1974) - similar US case
  • British Columbia Civil Liberties Association

Maps Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)



References


Briefing Book for the President of the Treasury Board of Canada ...
src: www.canada.ca


External links

  • Full text of Supreme Court of Canada decision available at LexUM and CanLII
  • Federal Court decision
  • BCCLA intervener factum


Source of the article : Wikipedia

Comments
0 Comments